Daniel Haqiqatjou from America, who has started to gain a large following from amongst the youth, has a confused aqeedah and bases his teachings on falsafa rather than the purity and soundness of the Qur'aan and Sunnah.  Based on this, he promotes philosophy books written by kuffaar to the uneducated Muslim youth of the west. His entire recommended reading list does not include Qur'aan, nor a single book of Hadeeth or a single book of 'aqeedah. This "da'wah" is nothing but corruption of the next generation.

Although refutation of western ideologies is necessary, it must be based on tawheed as described in the Qur'aan and the Sunnah of RasoolAllah (صلى الله عليه وسلم).  His lack of proper understanding is obvious to any true student of knowledge. Daniel has not studied Islam from the Islamic University, nor has he learned the positions of the scholars before claiming to support them. How can one stand for something he never learned? How would he know what to defend if he does not know where it starts and where it ends? Daniel has been asked several times to make clear from which of the scholars he takes his knowledge, so we can ascertain if his teachers are from Ahlul-Bid’ah or Ahlus-Sunnah.

His lack of taking knowledge from the authentic foundation of knowledge has led him to delusions of falsafa where he not only forgets to include the book of Allaah on his reading list, but instead, his reading list contains kuffaar from qawm loot! The image below is of a kaafir lootee who Daniel recommends the youth of our ummah to read to be aware of his falsafa delusions.

Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah) said in Naseehat Ahl Eemaan Fee Radd alaa Mantiq al Yunaan:

”Philosophical logic is like the flesh of a camel at the top of a mountain. It is not easy to climb the mountain, nor is the flesh good enough to justify climbing, nor is the path leading to it easy to follow.’’   

He (rahimahullaah) also said: ”There are no philosophers upon right guidance”  

He (rahimahullaah) also said: ‘’Islaam does not have philosophers’’

* * *

Daniel mentions a "so called salafi - ashari divide" and refers to critical matters of tawheed as "arcane issues of theology, e.g., issues that were debated 800 years ago but no one is debating today...issues like the precise technical interpretation of Allah's Names and Attributes."

And then look at his promotion of unauthentic aqeedah: